We are using Divesoft with our divegroup and at least for us it seems to be very accurate.Divesoft is not on my list as the ones I know of over here are not accurate.
Thanks.
Jon
I am undecided between the Analox at 500 quid and the Vandagraph at 700. I know the Vandagraph is good as I have used it lots, my question, is it 200 quid (GBP) better than the Analox? Divesoft is not on my list as the ones I know of over here are not accurate.
Thanks.
Jon
Has anyone ever wondered why these analyzers don't have a CO tester on them? I mean if we are measuring oxygen and helium why not add a CO monitor?
If one comes out I think people would buy them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Has anyone ever wondered why these analyzers don't have a CO tester on them? I mean if we are measuring oxygen and helium why not add a CO monitor?
If one comes out I think people would buy them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Using my own DIY He analyzer.
I believe there would not be any problem in having all in one analyzers -O2, He and CO. Problem is comercial producers would make you pay too much for them. The technology is not that problematic. What you need is sensor, microcontroller and display (if not touchscreen than some buttons too). Sure some knowledge on programming and math too..
Igor P
Sent from my PAP4500DUO using Tapatalk 2
Its not hard, but some of us don't like having all-in-one analyzers since when one part craps out (batteries or otherwise) the whole thing is often dead. The C squared units (for instance) are all modular and take AAA batteries. Simple.
I have one of the old atomox helium analyzers, still works fine although the internal battery died years ago. I have to plug it into the wall. That's not really an issue since I analyze at home before packing my truck/gear. When I go remote and I'm refilling in the bush I don't bother analyzing helium anymore. I could but would need to plug the analyzer into the generator.
ps. still haven't replaced mine.
Why not?
Igor P
Sent from my PAP4500DUO using Tapatalk 2