Curiosity really. But just thinking if you have this unit and your using it as a stepping stone to full ccr why not built experience with it. But again this is more like thinking out loud than anything.
 
On a side note I was reading the shearwater manual and the SCR mode can only be used when connected to O2 cells at least one. This was the petrel, how can you approximate the setting without connecting to or adding a sensor to the unit?
 
On a side note I was reading the shearwater manual and the SCR mode can only be used when connected to O2 cells at least one. This was the petrel, how can you approximate the setting without connecting to or adding a sensor to the unit?

Remember, this is not JUST a SCR - it is an eSCR. So there is not a constant flow of nitrox into the loop, it is controlled by the DCP (a funky algorithm based off the PO2).

Due to the way this unit works, in order for any external computer to be ever remotely accurate, it would need to be reading a cell.
 
So you would have to add a cell somewhere in the loop to have an accurate backup computer how difficult.

The backup computer would also have to have the same algorithm. I don't think it is worth it. If the main computer goes out the only option is to bail out. There is not way to run it manually. The only computer I could ever see that would help is one in gauge mode with a backup spg. So you know where to do a deco stop and if you have enough gas for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Remember, this is not JUST a SCR - it is an eSCR. So there is not a constant flow of nitrox into the loop, it is controlled by the DCP (a funky algorithm based off the PO2).

Due to the way this unit works, in order for any external computer to be ever remotely accurate, it would need to be reading a cell.

I may be wrong (if so correct me) but the idea of electronically controlling the Nitrox is to optimise the PO2 for the relevant depth (at least that's how I'd do it). If this is the case a deco computer set to automatically set the PO2 based on depth should be able to reasonably predict what the explorer is doing (maybe with some conservatism built in).
 
The backup computer would also have to have the same algorithm. I don't think it is worth it. If the main computer goes out the only option is to bail out. There is not way to run it manually. The only computer I could ever see that would help is one in gauge mode with a backup spg. So you know where to do a deco stop and if you have enough gas for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am thinking with a REC mind not TEC think on vacation 2days into 1week dive when it goes bzzt now you have 2 days worth of saturation with no way to continue other than tables and a guess at your loading. I was looking for some computer that can get close so if the explorer goes tits up I can continue to dive OC with just a little fuss.
 
Just figure out effective nitrox mix at deepest part of dive, run a standalone nitrox computer on this basis. It'll be more conservative than optimized deco on explorer. But if it all goes tits up just just use the basic nitrox computer for rest of week. May have to clear standalone, but shouldn't be too much of a problem, to stop it locking out for 24hrs.

If you have nitrox computer that supports several nitrox mixes put in a deep/mid/shallow mix & manually switch. I did this with a VR3 when it lost its CCR pin & computed deco was close enough.

You would also be surprised at how much you have off-gassed overnight just by waiting till the next day.
 
Well as I am taking an explorer class in a week, and I was sent a manual after reading it they make it pretty hard to carry a back up computer for any reason. UG!
 
I know this happens on my Tec dives where I do one dive a day & then have a surface interval of at least 18 hours. But on recreational trips where divers are doing 4 - 5 no-stop dives a day is this still the case?

It is hard to say without knowing the actual depths and times. This is why they say to wait over a day just in case. Same thing with flying.

But you can figure it out more precisely using a planning software. I am not telling you to not wait a full day I am just saying if that is a concern of yours plan it out and see what the real numbers are. It might not be of such concern to you then or maybe it will be. It depends.
 
So what your saying if you dive an Explorer which I don't intend to (after my Sentinel experience I'll never dive a Kevin Gurr designed system again!!) you***8217;ll loose a days diving on a trip if it backups. I'd just run a computer on Air or a weak Nitrox & use that....

Most of these new generation "rec" rebreathers are heavily computer dependent. These machines aren't designed for redundancy or any kind of backup system. It's just the nature of the beast
 
I wonder if the Sport Kiss was the first real "Rec" Rebreather? No no computers just dead simple, light and cheap.
Dave
 
You would also be surprised at how much you have off-gassed overnight just by waiting till the next day.

Interesting that V-Planner generally let's you do the same dive three hours later in many cases....
I wonder if after a while diving the Explorer if you'd get a feel for for what the mix is and be OK matching a stand alone nitrox computer?

We've done the whole dive logging a'la BSAC way and dropped people onto tables midway through a series of dive when the computer craps out, but also dived a computer set to air when diving nitrox to try and catch up with a hardwired computer. It's only deco "theory" after all
 
I wonder if the Sport Kiss was the first real "Rec" Rebreather? No no computers just dead simple, light and cheap.
Dave

Except did any agency teach it as a recreational rebreather? Meaning less prerequisites or a simplified course?
It may be a recreational rebreather I just don't think it was accepted like that by the community.
 
I wonder if the Sport Kiss was the first real "Rec" Rebreather? No no computers just dead simple, light and cheap.
Dave

With the launch of PADI Rebreather and Advanced Rebreather Courses PADI now have core courses to cover the vast majority of rebreathers.

In addition to this PADI have launched the mSCR distinctive. Like other manufacturers distinctive specialties, these courses are applied for by manufacturers.

The mSCR distinctive specialty is built on the integrated Rebreather and Advanced Rebreather Diver courses with the same required materials, diver and instructor pre-requisites and basic training PLUS some additions; Practical Applications and Training Dive Performance Requirements have some adaptations to accommodate the different requirements of the mSCR and there is an additional “distinctive” knowledge development module addressing the differences between eCCR/eSCR and the mSCR being taught.

This route is not for rebreathers that do not meet Type R but for those that cannot meet Type R, due to significant design differences. It is also not an easy route, with manufacturers working closely with PADI’s Technical Diving Division, Rebreather Advisory Team to address the different training requirements for a unit that cannot meet Type R requirements. The manufacturer still has to make sure the rebreathers meet tough standards and have third party testing.

KISS Rebreathers are the first manufacturer to take up this challenge and suitably qualified and experienced PADI Instructors can now become KISS GEM mSCR Distinctive Specialty Instructors.
 
Well I just had my first day of training with the explorer and all I can say holy spastic elevator batman! Second dive was much better got some weight out and found some miss adjusted stuff to make the third dive even better. Of all the years I have lurked in the rebreather forums makes me now wished I had just gone an dove one instead of wishing. Thanks for all the info guys it really helped out!!
 
Back
Top