Electronic vs manual CCR

Status
Not open for further replies.
This (click link below) is pPO2 graph (pPO2 vs. Depth) of experimental "mechanical mixing" rebreather ("mmSCR") I played with.
Do you have pPO2 graph of your simple and elegant solution?
In your solution d(ppO2)/dh is not equal to zero, for large depths, also at small depths.

The diagram DCSC have a solution to your problem, you were talking about in your email.

greet rc
 
In your solution d(ppO2)/dh is not equal to zero, for large depths, also at small depths.

The diagram DCSC have a solution to your problem, you were talking about in your email.

greet rc

I have to try mmSCR with pure gases.

Me have mmSCR before you have elegant solution/patent [joke]
 
I have to try mmSCR with pure gases.

Me have mmSCR before you have elegant solution/patent [joke]

At the moment I have 2 patents, another way proceduje to the Patent Office.
The earliest reported solution is an innovative system of oxygen dosage, suitable for CCR versions of m, e ... .[This is not just a joke]

Invent resubmit patents, really is a very broad field.

rc greet
 
At the moment I have 2 patents, another way proceduje to the Patent Office.
The earliest reported solution is an innovative system of oxygen dosage, suitable for CCR versions of m, e ... .[This is not just a joke]

Invent resubmit patents, really is a very broad field.

rc greet

Patent not my field and no interest. You keep patent.

I just like diving.

Do you have graph of pPO2 vs. Depth of your solution/patent?
 
Patent not my field and no interest. You keep patent.

I just like diving.

Do you have graph of pPO2 vs. Depth of your solution/patent?
Ask at your patent office if fees are, if the patentee is the author.

You already have the information, a bit more at the Patent Office is to change the language.

rc greet
 
Ask at your patent office if fees are, if the patentee is the author.

You already have the information, a bit more at the Patent Office is to change the language.

rc greet

I am crazy test diver, not Author.

Author mmSCR is CO.

No interest in Patent Office.

Do you have prototype and real test result of pPO2 vs. Depth?

pPO2 vs. Depth graph no secret.
 
Quote: (Originally Posted by anarchista)
Ask at your patent office if fees are, if the patentee is the author.

You already have the information, a bit more at the Patent Office is to change the language.

rc greet
I am crazy test diver, not Author.

Author mmSCR is CO.

No interest in Patent Office.

Do you have prototype and real test result of pPO2 vs. Depth?

pPO2 vs. Depth graph no secret.

Finally, two turing machines talking to each other. :trophy:
B :flip:
 
pPO2 vs. Depth graph no secret.

I send a Polish version of the latest version of the description will be available on the site, and major at least one claims, then you'll know what's on the charts.

I do not know your solution, the reasons why it has to be familiar with.
Ask yourself, what will happen with ppO2, when the diver to reduce effort peace the 0.4 lO2/min or effort then increase to 2.5 l / min. What you will have a change ppO2.
The second issue, pure inert gas if you have a CMF dose provides greater dosing inert gas. It will be a problem.

In my embodiments 1, 2 and 3, the change of gas to another, poses no problem.

greet rc
 
I send a Polish version of the latest version of the description will be available on the site, and major at least one claims, then you'll know what's on the charts.

I do not know your solution, the reasons why it has to be familiar with.
Ask yourself, what will happen with ppO2, when the diver to reduce effort peace the 0.4 lO2/min or effort then increase to 2.5 l / min. What you will have a change ppO2.
The second issue, pure inert gas if you have a CMF dose provides greater dosing inert gas. It will be a problem.

In my embodiments 1, 2 and 3, the change of gas to another, poses no problem.

greet rc

My solution not as good as yours.

Forget my solution.

Show yours!
 
I have pictures of the first run of the 2 solutions with the oxygen generating masses...

greet rc

Oxygen generating masses may be O.K. in Russian submarine or Space Vehicle, but not conventional rebreather.

Do you have solution which use standard O2 gas bottle instead of oxygen generating mass?

That solution is one I like to see one day depth vs. PPO2 chart.
 
Oxygen generating masses may be O.K. in Russian submarine or Space Vehicle, but not conventional rebreather.

Do you have solution which use standard O2 gas bottle instead of oxygen generating mass?

Much of the mining industry is using such solutions is also working apparatus-Air Elite MSA Auer in this technique. Tank escape structures are also Polish (have No NATO) and Soviet IP 5. IDA 59M in large batches were sold to India.

The third solution is simple, a modification of the well-known SCR CVR for constant ppO2. So far not published in full.

greet rc
 
Much of the mining industry is using such solutions is also working apparatus-Air Elite MSA Auer in this technique. Tank escape structures are also Polish (have No NATO) and Soviet IP 5. IDA 59M in large batches were sold to India.

The third solution is simple, a modification of the well-known SCR CVR for constant ppO2. So far not published in full.

greet rc

Yes, and they were used during the Cold War by Cuban military conscripts (and if they had a choice they would have not put their mouth to one of them because in case of water ingress "it would blow out flames from the mouthpiece like a Dragon").

BUT I do not see how you can design a rebreather (to be used underwater by the average diver) with oxygen generating masses.

When you patent your third solution, give us details/data/numbers/charts...
 
BUT I do not see how you can design a rebreather (to be used underwater by the average diver) with oxygen generating masses.

When you patent your third solution, give us details/data/numbers/charts...
I'll post photos.

The number is shown in my profile.

greet rc
 
It is a photo of my first run SCR SMS with oxygen chemically acumulated.
But you do not want it ....
(Read description I sent.)

greet rc

C'mon... you like teasing, Ben is right on this.

...but I know you have object of desire... so now show and tell (I come to Poland next I want to touch too).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top