narayaana
New Member
hi guys,
I am a newbie en Tec, I was asked as a test, to plan a short dive at 60m for 20 minutes.
My base idea was to start CCR Heliox (please take it as the assumption that this is part of the exercise).
I chose deco with air. it gives almost the shortest deco time (deco air + 100% oxy at 6 m).
It made sense for me, because Helium is not nitrogen, hence no further on gazing of Helium.
Off gazing would be like blood helium vs air (virtually no helium) on ascent, which sounded faster.
A bit of nitrogen on-gazing during super short deco (less than 40 minutes).
it seems like nothing goes against switching from nitrox/air to oxy, but how about heliox/air ?
Is there any studies against switch this way ?
I am a newbie en Tec, I was asked as a test, to plan a short dive at 60m for 20 minutes.
My base idea was to start CCR Heliox (please take it as the assumption that this is part of the exercise).
I chose deco with air. it gives almost the shortest deco time (deco air + 100% oxy at 6 m).
It made sense for me, because Helium is not nitrogen, hence no further on gazing of Helium.
Off gazing would be like blood helium vs air (virtually no helium) on ascent, which sounded faster.
A bit of nitrogen on-gazing during super short deco (less than 40 minutes).
it seems like nothing goes against switching from nitrox/air to oxy, but how about heliox/air ?
Is there any studies against switch this way ?