Safety of radial vs axial scrubber

Status
Not open for further replies.
matt said:
Personally I think this thread came to a natural conclusion sometime ago, but then I was simply accused of being narrow minded and wanting the thread closed as it didn't suit my needs. I have no needs so I have no clue what I'm being narrow minded about. I'd be very happy diving any of the mainstream units, with either type of scrubber, but obviously not a Sentinel :poke:

Oh, and I received the number I was looking for (and a citation) by PM, so the thread was useful after all.

Regards
Mo.
Click to expand...

Since Matt has opened the same thread on another forum and there is too many complaints to carry on the discussion here openly and democratically, I agree with Matt this thread should be closed.

It will not change the numbers nor stop the discussions.

Next we will close Parliament with this attitude.

I humbly register my disappointment.
 
Last edited:
gianaameri said:
Since Matt has opened the same thread on another forum and there is too many complaints to carry on the discussion here openly and democratically, I agree with Matt this thread should be closed.

It will not change the numbers nor stop the discussions.

Next we will close Parliament with this attitude.

I humbly register my disappointment.
Click to expand...

I'm disappointed too! I have been reading and following this thread since it's start. There has been some very good information in the past pages.

Are you going to be compiling a database of numbers and there meanings (explanation of the measurements)?

If so, will it be available to everyone via a website?

-Matt

Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk 2
 
Sorry Clare - I'm going to have to invoke the Cheeky girls in response.. They are not deployed without need..

cheeky-girls-4.jpg
 
gianaameri said:
Since Matt has opened the same thread on another forum and there is too many complaints to carry on the discussion here openly and democratically, I agree with Matt this thread should be closed.
Click to expand...
I reviewed the discussion on YD, I must say a great level. As early as the second entry appears absorber working mathematical model. In subsequent posts is developed on the cylindrical symmetry of the trap (radial). Next there are: grad, div, rot, fly like butterflies. There talking manufacturers closed circuits.

Against this background, our discussion is a joke.

greet rc
 
anarchista said:
I reviewed the discussion on YD, I must say a great level. As early as the second entry appears absorber working mathematical model. In subsequent posts is developed on the cylindrical symmetry of the trap (radial). Next there are: grad, div, rot, fly like butterflies. There talking manufacturers closed circuits.

Against this background, our discussion is a joke.

greet rc
Click to expand...

93946.strip.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top