Dry Hypoxia Training for Rebreather Divers

Have you ever done an intentional dry hypoxia exposure?

  • Yes, monitored by a professional in training.

    Votes: 7 8.0%
  • Yes, at home with a friend.

    Votes: 8 9.1%
  • Yes, but as a part of an aviation training course.

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • No, but believe that it might be useful for rebreather divers.

    Votes: 51 58.0%
  • No way, you kidding me?

    Votes: 23 26.1%

  • Total voters
    88
With all this comparison the the aviation industry, specifically military aviation, it peaked my curiosity as to whether or not this type of training was something conducted during military CCR training. Surely, if anyone would be doing this, it would be the navy. I inquired upon an acquaintance who is a Chief at the Fleet Dive Unit (Canadian Military, which I believe is the equivalent to Master Chief in the US military) and this was his reply:

"We used to do this (before my time) but do not anymore. As I was told they would breath out of a paper bag while sitting down in the chamber until they could not handle it anymore. It was to give them experience to some of the symptoms of CO2 build up so that they may recognize it in the future. Not something I would like to do however the experience may be useful for some (although you may loose a few brain cells). The issue I mainly have with it is that someone may not experience the same symptoms the next time and/or skip all the symptoms and go right to unconsciousness as it can vary widely from day to day and dive to dive. Hope that helps"
 
Last edited:
"Illegal"? "For sure" ?

Not so.

I believe that you will find that FlightSafety International offers the course at their Farnborough England training center and does several hundred of the sessions annually. .......
Dave

.

Dave, no need to twist my reply in another direction, you know better

This is a forum dedicated to CCR diving

In Europe for sure it is illegal for a dive instructor, to do things on purpose that make their students pass out. Clear now?

Paul

Btw, I don't like all this fuss going around on internet forums: I just make my point clear: in a rEvo course I do not allow this. Point.
 
It's been said above though that if you lose consciousness the exercise is pointless as you won't remember the symptoms and lose all benefit.

there are other ways available to demonstrate the dangers of hypoxia to students and with these alternative methods available, the risks outweigh the benefits of conducting this exercise in any environment that is not controlled by medical personnel monitorring the participant.

I think any muppet can see that hypoxia is dangerous, if they can't get their heads around that then they should probably stick to snorkeling, or watching David Attenborough videos...
It still seems a useful part of the toolbox to give you another chance of survival when the brown stuff has hit the whirly thing, and maybe even give anybody who does not respect the risks a bit of a wake up call as to how the symptoms may occur in subtle ways.

I reckon if monitored by a mate, possibly one who's also a CCR diver and first aid trained with some O2 on standby it's close enough to medical personnel.
 
In Europe for sure it is illegal for a dive instructor, to do things on purpose that make their students pass out. Clear now?

Examination of the decompression apparatus diving CRABE "Designing decompression combat missions", required the consent of the Bioethics Committee. The Commission consisted of 15 people, most of professorial titles.
Many studies can not wait to implement due to lack of evaluation committee.

Dave, you have studied the behavior of pure inert gases?
(NO)
The average effort?
(NO)
What is the impact on the occurrence of ppN2 signs of pre-emptive?
(NO)
The results are published?
Another center confirmed the results and conclusions?

Arrange in Europe, with the approval of the study by the Bioethics Committee.

rc greet
 
Dave, no need to twist my reply in another direction, you know better

This is a forum dedicated to CCR diving

In Europe for sure it is illegal for a dive instructor, to do things on purpose that make their students pass out. Clear now?

Paul

Btw, I don't like all this fuss going around on internet forums: I just make my point clear: in a rEvo course I do not allow this. Point.



To your points:

1: I moderate the forum. I am aware of it's purpose... :wave:

2: Please read the subject discussion in detail. At no time is it suggested that anyone "pass out", in fact the opposite. The student MUST maintain conciousness to the end, otherwise he will not remember his signs, and the entire training is wasted.

3: The subject is exactly the same no matter if discussed within diving circles or within aviation circles.

But to be clear:

(A): I'm not suggesting that it be done by a diving instructor.

(B): I'm suggesting that it be done by someone who is a trained professional with a formal background in the subject.

(C): And I am pointing out that it is *already* done thousands of times a year with high quality results.


4: I am sure that at times the internet "fuss" is bothersome to people. It would be lots simpler if we all simply agreed to eat one thing every day, and to drink one type of koool-aid every day, and to all dive one type of rebreather. But it is not going to happen, and until then there will always be those bothersome people who think differently than others. Sometimes they are wrong. Other times they are right. I mean... who in their insane mind would think that modifying Russian oxygen rebreathers and then diving them, to 40 meters is not insane? But one smart guy copied another smart guy, and in the end it was not insane, was it? Let experts continue to be experts. This is how we advance ourselves.


There are many people teaching diving who have diving as a "hobby" and have other areas of professional expertise. Yours is sheet metal fabrication. Others are lawyers, doctors, etc. Mine is high-level aviation training. To think that all of us "forget" our other professional knowlage when we pick up a diving mask? Well...


And there is much that is taught well outside of rEvo classes. First aid, dive rescue, CPR, freediving, and yes... high altitude training, which can be taken by pilots and also by non-pilots for their own professional advancement.


Dave

.
 
"We used to do this (before my time) but do not anymore. As I was told they would breath out of a paper bag while sitting down in the chamber until they could not handle it anymore. It was to give them experience to some of the symptoms of CO2 build up so that they may recognize it in the future. Not something I would like to do however the experience may be useful for some (although you may loose a few brain cells). The issue I mainly have with it is that someone may not experience the same symptoms the next time and/or skip all the symptoms and go right to unconsciousness as it can vary widely from day to day and dive to dive. Hope that helps"


Interesting...

But first, this is a hypercapnia drill, not a hypoxia drill. IE: It is the crude equal to trying a rebreather on the couch without a scrubber, not with a scrubber loaded and not replenishing the 02.

And it's a good point, as I was just going to moot the question "how many have done a couch dive to experience hypercapnia?" (which in my estimation is far more dangerous... this is the thing that can trigger a cardiovascular event...)


As for symptoms in hypoxia, what we teach in aerospace is that you will never "lose" a symptom from experience to exerience, but you may add new ones as you continue to gain experiences. Example: I do my chamber ride every two years, and every year I see the same set of symptoms but now and then I add a new one to my matrix.. and two years later I can go and find that same symptom again.

Everyone is different, but here are mine:

(1): a flash of "heat" across the back of my neck, followed by a "pins and needles" feeling in my scalp.

(2): the sensation of "sun glare" as my vision deterioriates (a very early symptom, MINUTES before any other for me at 0.10 PP02)

(3) Basic sense of unease.

(4) This sense is lost and I feel "better"...

(5) recognition that coordination requires more effort

(6) then the spiral into where I cannot assist myself.


At a PP02 of 0.10 this takes me about 15 minutes (at rest).

At a PP02 of 0.05 this takes me about 2 minutes (at rest)


But EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT which is why personal knowlage is something that the aerospace community INSISTS on.


Dave

.
 
Note that these are NOT hypobaric chamber experiences, they are experiences using controlled amounts of less than normoxic nitrox to produce clinical hypoxia for training experiences in a controlled environment.

What FO2 do they use, Dave?
 
Very interesting, thanks for finding out.

Matt.

With all this comparison the the aviation industry, specifically military aviation, it peaked my curiosity as to whether or not this type of training was something conducted during military CCR training. Surely, if anyone would be doing this, it would be the navy. I inquired upon an acquaintance who is a Chief at the Fleet Dive Unit (Canadian Military, which I believe is the equivalent to Master Chief Petty Office in the US military) and this was his reply:

"We used to do this (before my time) but do not anymore. As I was told they would breath out of a paper bag while sitting down in the chamber until they could not handle it anymore. It was to give them experience to some of the symptoms of CO2 build up so that they may recognize it in the future. Not something I would like to do however the experience may be useful for some (although you may loose a few brain cells). The issue I mainly have with it is that someone may not experience the same symptoms the next time and/or skip all the symptoms and go right to unconsciousness as it can vary widely from day to day and dive to dive. Hope that helps"
 
And it's a good point, as I was just going to moot the question "how many have done a couch dive to experience hypercapnia?" (which in my estimation is far more dangerous... this is the thing that can trigger a cardiovascular event...)

How about hyperoxia - is there any advantage in training for that?

At a PP02 of 0.10 this takes me about 15 minutes (at rest).

At a PP02 of 0.05 this takes me about 2 minutes (at rest)

Interesting. 5% is very low.

Matt.
 
(B) That I'm suggesting it be done by someone who is a trained professional with a formal background in the subject.

(C): And I am pointing out That it is * already * done thousands of times a year with high quality results.

Bottom line, there are no people who have appropriate training in dive training with early signs of hypoxia.


But first, this is a drill hypercapnia, hypoxia not a drill. IE: It is the crude equal to trying a rebreather on the couch without a scrubber, not with a scrubber loaded and not replenishing the 02

And it's a good point, as I was just going to moot the question "how many have done a couch to experience hypercapnia dive?" (which in my estimation is far more dangerous ... this is the thing That can trigger a cardiovascular event ...)
As I have to say let's talk specifically, the rapid growth ppCO2 does not have many symptoms. Fast breathing reflex is blocked.
A slow build-up of ppCO2 symptoms are easy to spot.

I had no symptoms so severe breathing pure nitrogen !!!

At a PP02 of 0.10 this takes me about 15 minutes (at rest).

At a PP02 of 0.05 this takes me about 2 minutes (at rest)

Of course, a diver dives without an effort (at rest).

You run away from my questions.

greet rc
 
2: Please read the subject discussion in detail. At no time is it suggested that anyone "pass out", in fact the opposite. The student MUST maintain conciousness to the end, otherwise he will not remember his signs, and the entire training is wasted.

Dave

Very good if it will be this way in the future then, because it is clear that things don't always go according to plan.

And anyway, as I said, not in a rEvo course. I think we all agree then.
 
What FO2 do they use, Dave?


This system simulates hypoxia up to 30,000 feet so do the math, but...

As low as 0.025? (!!).

My feeling is that this is too "high" (low PP02) as onset rate is too rapid to allow a student to see and understand the progression of symptoms.

0.05 is 18,000, which is about "right". It is predictable, and the onset rate is slow enough so that good observation of symptom progression is possible by the student. It is the "Industry Standard".

0.10 is a long a wait for symptoms... you could be there all day. Literally with some people.


In the chamber, 25,000 is the "normal" training altitude. Run the math for that too please? You're the math guru. I just use my fingers and toes.



Dave

.
 
Last edited:
You run away from my questions.



I am not sure what your questions are.

I am not even sure that you are asking questions.

It seems that you are making statements.

And I am not even sure what the statements are saying.

I'm happy to discuss, but we are not discussing C02, or breathing inert gas (which can kill you...), or the use of different hardware systems to prevent hypoxia.

So... I am uncertain as to how you want to discuss it.


But I am happy to do it!


Dave


.
 
Last edited:
How about hyperoxia - is there any advantage in training for that?


No clue, "probably not", and "you would need a chamber".

When I worked in the industry as a commercial diver, we routinely went into the chamber at 60 feet and breathed pure 02 for 30 minutes for our quarterly "Oxygen Tolerance Test". This was "suppopsed" to make sure we could breathe 02 at 40 feet in the water for decompression purposes (which we did every day). After I left the company this "Test" was discontinued, and I never folllowed up with a "why". You can well imagine that there is a huge difference between a dry and wet hyperbaric environment though. One of my first jobs at the company was administering the tests as a chamber operator. I can say that after giving 100's of the "Tests" that nobody ever failed....


Giving training where there's a predictable and gentle outcome (Hypoxia).. OK.

Giving a "test" to see when someone might go into a grand mal seizure? Uhh.... spooky. I hated it.


Dave

.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure what your questions are.

I am not even sure that you are asking questions.

It seems that you are making statements.

And I am not even sure what the statements are saying.

I'm happy to discuss, but we are not discussing C02, or breathing inert gas (which can kill you...), or the use of different hardware systems to prevent hypoxia.

So... I am uncertain as to how you want to discuss it.


But I am happy to do it!

I'll try to write more clearly

Do you have a study of early symptoms of hypoxia, when breathing pure inert gas?

(You do not have such information.)

Are there signs of early hypoxia with great effort?

(You do not have such information.)

Are the early signs of hypoxia are just as clear in the presence of high levels of ppN2?

(You do not have such information.)

greet rc
 
This system simulates hypoxia up to 30,000 feet so do the math, but...

As low as 0.025? (!!).

My feeling is that this is too "high" (low PP02) as onset rate is too rapid to allow a student to see and understand the progression of symptoms.

0.05 is 18,000, which is about "right". It is predictable, and the onset rate is slow enough so that good observation of symptom progression is possible by the student. It is the "Industry Standard".

0.10 is a long a wait for symptoms... you could be there all day. Literally with some people.


In the chamber, 25,000 is the "normal" training altitude. Run the math for that too please? You're the math guru. I just use my fingers and toes.



Dave

.

Thanks - interesting info.

CalcTool: Pressure at altitude calculator

Matt.
 
Giving training where there's a predictable and gentle outcome (Hypoxia).. OK.

Giving a "test" to see when someone might go into a grand mal seizure? Uhh.... spooky. I hated it.

Make me wonder which event has most probability of occurring - hypoxia, hyperoxia or hypercapnia. We hear more on the internet about the latter 2, I think.

Matt.
 
I would agree with the probability of each.

We work SO far away from hypoxia that's its almost a non issue in my opinion, except at the surface. Free flowing adv with 10%, surface, waves, foam making it hard to see displays, struggling with attaching a stage... That's a hypoxia mishap looking for a place. Would you recognize it? Not if you've not trained to detect it.

Hypercapnia? Possibility on every dive.

Hyperoxia? Two bad cells and a rig that follows them and you're off to the races.


All have happened.



Dave

.
 
I'll try to write more clearly

Do you have a study of early symptoms of hypoxia, when breathing pure inert gas?

(You do not have such information.)

Are there signs of early hypoxia with great effort?

(You do not have such information.)

Are the early signs of hypoxia are just as clear in the presence of high levels of ppN2?

(You do not have such information.)

greet rc



It's presumptive to state what information I do or do not have.

I do not see questions here, only statements.

None of the above is germane to the discussion.

If you have information to share, please do so.

I am writing with simple statements in order that your language translation is easy. I'm not writing this way to be difficult.

Dave


.
 
Last edited:
Interesting...

But first, this is a hypercapnia drill, not a hypoxia drill. IE: It is the crude equal to trying a rebreather on the couch without a scrubber, not with a scrubber loaded and not replenishing the 02.

And it's a good point, as I was just going to moot the question "how many have done a couch dive to experience hypercapnia?" (which in my estimation is far more dangerous... this is the thing that can trigger a cardiovascular event...)


As for symptoms in hypoxia, what we teach in aerospace is that you will never "lose" a symptom from experience to exerience, but you may add new ones as you continue to gain experiences. Example: I do my chamber ride every two years, and every year I see the same set of symptoms but now and then I add a new one to my matrix.. and two years later I can go and find that same symptom again.

Everyone is different, but here are mine:

(1): a flash of "heat" across the back of my neck, followed by a "pins and needles" feeling in my scalp.

(2): the sensation of "sun glare" as my vision deterioriates (a very early symptom, MINUTES before any other for me at 0.10 PP02)

(3) Basic sense of unease.

(4) This sense is lost and I feel "better"...

(5) recognition that coordination requires more effort

(6) then the spiral into where I cannot assist myself.


At a PP02 of 0.10 this takes me about 15 minutes (at rest).

At a PP02 of 0.05 this takes me about 2 minutes (at rest)


But EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT which is why personal knowlage is something that the aerospace community INSISTS on.


Dave

.

Yes, I am aware he's talking about hypercapnia when he is describing breathing out of the paper bag in the chamber. He was using that as an example of something else the clearance divers used to have to do but no longer do. However, I understand that ANDI has a drill where they remove the student's scrubber in the pool?

You apparently know your symptoms of hypoxia very clearly. Now, you've obviously done hypoxia exercises numerous times throughout your aviation career. I highly doubt you knew with such certainty what your symptoms were after your very first hypoxia drill. My concern would be that someone does this exercise once, thinks they know, then experiences something else when the real thing happens but they ignore it because it's different or something they didn't experience the first time. Someone previously mentioned what about when coupled with narcosis and at this point you're experiencing mixed symptoms? How do you interpret those? There are many variables. Doing this exercise once could cause someone to falsely feel armed with information when they, in fact, have incomplete data.

I understand completely why the aviation industry would conduct hypoxia training with its participants. My brother is a commercial pilot and he underwent this training as well. He describes two purposes for this training, the first you've already mentioned, to recognize symptoms and therefore the onset of hypoxia and the second, to be able to function with it (i.e. deployment and donning of oxygen masks). The chances of someone in the aviation industry encountering hypoxia is a very plausible possibility, whereas, this is something that a recreational diver should never encounter. It circles back to proper training and diving practices. Once, when I first got my Meg, I did not push the QC connection for the solenoid in far enough. The distance from the truck to the dive site entrance was a bit of a walk and I was prebreathing as I walked to the entry. One of my predive checks is to let the loop breath down below a 0.4 setpoint and confirm that the solenoid is functioning. As I walked I kept hearing the solenoid fire but no PO2 increase on my handset. After it fired 4 or 5 times and my PO2 only diminished, I knew something was up with my solenoid and asked my buddy to verify that the solenoid was connected, it was connected but not pushed in all the way. Key points:

1) Prebreath your rebreather BEFORE you get in the water.
2) If an eCCR, prebreath at a setpoint of 0.4 so even if the solenoid does fail to fire, you SHOULD notice before the loop reaches a hypoxic level.
3) As anarchista states previously, work towards designing equipment that prevents hypoxia; the newer Meg CE version no longer uses a QC connection, they use a LP hose fitting that screws into the head, if not screwed in all the way, a leak would be noticed during the predive checks.
4) I had TWO indications of a problem long before I was even close to a state of hypoxia.

You stated previously:

"Hypoxia in rebreather use is caused by technical failure (IE: a freeflowing ADV with hypoxic diluent near the surface), or human error (IE: not turning on 02), but not by any deliberate act."

A free flowing ADV with hypoxic DIL is something that should be caught during the predive checks and if not, the prebreath. At depth, this would not be such a big issue, but would cause a change of buoyancy. One of the first thing you learn on an entry level CCR course is that any unaccounted change in buoyancy on a rebreather is a cause for concern and a further investigation is required, the corrective action would be to execute a BOOM drill. At the level where you are diving an hypoxic DIL, you should have the experience and knowledge to know how to notice and deal with a free flowing ADV: shut down the problem valve and thumb the dive, feather if necessary to exit an overhead environment. Again, if proper diving practices are followed, with this scenario there are two indications of an issue long before one should become close to hypoxic. If someone cannot recognize the the sign that they are on the road to hypoxia, then what makes you think this person has the situational awareness required to recognize the symptoms of hypoxia as they succumb to them? To quote one of the men I admire most in my life, "while we try to make things as idiot proof as possible, there is always a smarter idiot".

We work SO far away from hypoxia that's its almost a non issue in my opinion, except at the surface. Free flowing adv with 10%, surface, waves, foam making it hard to see displays, struggling with attaching a stage... That's a hypoxia mishap looking for a place. Would you recognize it? Not if you've not trained to detect it.

There is no excuse for not always being aware of your PO2. If you're carrying hypoxic DIL, you should be even MORE aware. I don't buy "foam making it hard to see displays", make it possible, it's your PO2, it's important, or look at your HUD if you have one. The group I dive with drops a line off the back of the boat and we clip our bailout tanks below the surface. This is particularly advantageous in big weather as you can drop down below the surface chop and attach your bottles off in much more manageable conditions. Those who struggle with bottles at the surface in big weather are more likely to end up with a bloody nose courtesy of the dive ladder or swim grid or a clonk on the noggin from bouncing against the hull. This is again, where good diving practices are beneficial. We are trained to thumb a dive when the first issue develops, rather than waiting for it to snowball. With this scenario, a number of things would have had to have been neglected prior to entering the water.

With respect to failure to turn on your O2 bottle, again, this should be caught during the prebreath on the surface prior to entering the water. This should also be something that is double checked just prior to entering the water. Once again (do I sound like a broken record yet?) proper diving practices. I have an APECS and always confirm my setpoint just prior to splashing. It's like a seatbelt. You have to put it on for it to be effective, most of us put it on without thinking about it. You might drive 100,000km without one and nothing will happen but when it does it could save your life. If you make it a habit to confirm your O2 is on/set point set prior to entering the water, it will save you life and prevent you from becoming hypoxic.

So, no, I do not see the value in a diver doing a "hypoxic couch dive" to acquire an incomplete set of data as to what a divers unique personal set of symptoms would be in the event of hypoxia, not when the diver should NEVER be allowing his/her PO2 to come anywhere close to the clutches of hypoxia, at the surface or underwater. I see more value in using the time teach the little tricks that keep them as far away from hypoxia as possible (i.e. checking O2/setpoint, donning bailouts just below the surface in the event of big weather, prebreathing on the surface, etc.).

So agree to disagree I suppose? I have my teaching methods, you have yours.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top