Dave Sutton
Banned
Howdy,
Just had a question come back to me by one of the manufacturers of a rig that I teach regarding a question on conducting optional dry-environment hypoxia training for students. Essentially the question regards the "ethics" for lack of a better term of allowing a closely monitored student to sit on the couch and breathe from an ever-decreasing PP02 loop while doing simple word and math problems until the first signs of hypoxia are noted.
This was done to me in training when I first qualified on rebreathers, and is done in a slightly different venue to me annually as part of my high altitude physiology training for my work as a test pilot. In both cases I felt/feel that the training is some of the most valuable that I have ever had. In fact, I can say without hesitation that I am alive as a result, having intercepted a hypoxia event at altitude in a jet that would no doubt have caused loss of conciousness within another minute, in a situation where I would have certainly crashed and died as a result.
Hypoxia training is conducted for aviation in hypobaric chambers, essentially a low pressure chamber where the students are exposed to low altitude conditons in a controlled environment, and are taught their personal hypoxia symptoms. Many become unconcious... and are simply put back on 02 by the attendant. This is part and parcel of becoming a military pilot, and course are offered by several organizations to civil pilots as well.
One of those other civil agencies, FlightSafety International, uses a ROBS system in flight simulators, (Reduced Oxygen Breathing System), which uses reduced 02 nitrox to simulate high altitude for pilots flying a simulator. In a different walk of my life, I managed this system for the FSI center where I instructed for 12 years, and we put over 1600 pilots thru the course under my direction. The US Navy now uses the same system, and I had an opportunity to participate as a student myself last week. The ROBS uses air and PP02 sensors and a solenoid (sound familiar?) to inject NITROGEN into the loop to maintain selectable LOW PP02, essentially a rebreather turned inside out. This training and equipment is well established in aviation training.
The question comes now to use of a rebreather in a DRY (not wet) environment to induce clinical hypoxia, in order to teach divers the sinister and very subtle signs of hypoxia. The method is to turn off the 02, and while being VERY carefully monitored to breathe the loop while safely seated and while NEVER using a gag strap, etc (in fact we do not let the student even place the mouth-bits of a mouthpiece inside the lips), and then to let them do word games and math questions until they first see symptoms of hypoxia. At that time they are recovered by dropping out the mouthpiece. This has been done 1000's of times and if monitored correctly is a safe and viable method of training.
Some links to other information:
This is the course that I ran for many years:
Altitude Chambers Don't Cut It For Pilot Training - Jetwhine - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion
This is a civil-access chamber course:
High-Altitude Chamber Course: Why it is a Must for Any Pilot | Coast Flight Training | iflycoast
More on the ROBS system:
Training to Survive Hypoxia Without Actually Getting It - Office of Naval Research
I'm interested to hear how many people have had this done in training, have tried it at home (DO NOT!, but please anonomously let us know via the poll), how many never thought about it, how many would like to take such a training event, and how many say "No Way Jose'" .
Discussion?
Dave
.
Just had a question come back to me by one of the manufacturers of a rig that I teach regarding a question on conducting optional dry-environment hypoxia training for students. Essentially the question regards the "ethics" for lack of a better term of allowing a closely monitored student to sit on the couch and breathe from an ever-decreasing PP02 loop while doing simple word and math problems until the first signs of hypoxia are noted.
This was done to me in training when I first qualified on rebreathers, and is done in a slightly different venue to me annually as part of my high altitude physiology training for my work as a test pilot. In both cases I felt/feel that the training is some of the most valuable that I have ever had. In fact, I can say without hesitation that I am alive as a result, having intercepted a hypoxia event at altitude in a jet that would no doubt have caused loss of conciousness within another minute, in a situation where I would have certainly crashed and died as a result.
Hypoxia training is conducted for aviation in hypobaric chambers, essentially a low pressure chamber where the students are exposed to low altitude conditons in a controlled environment, and are taught their personal hypoxia symptoms. Many become unconcious... and are simply put back on 02 by the attendant. This is part and parcel of becoming a military pilot, and course are offered by several organizations to civil pilots as well.
One of those other civil agencies, FlightSafety International, uses a ROBS system in flight simulators, (Reduced Oxygen Breathing System), which uses reduced 02 nitrox to simulate high altitude for pilots flying a simulator. In a different walk of my life, I managed this system for the FSI center where I instructed for 12 years, and we put over 1600 pilots thru the course under my direction. The US Navy now uses the same system, and I had an opportunity to participate as a student myself last week. The ROBS uses air and PP02 sensors and a solenoid (sound familiar?) to inject NITROGEN into the loop to maintain selectable LOW PP02, essentially a rebreather turned inside out. This training and equipment is well established in aviation training.
The question comes now to use of a rebreather in a DRY (not wet) environment to induce clinical hypoxia, in order to teach divers the sinister and very subtle signs of hypoxia. The method is to turn off the 02, and while being VERY carefully monitored to breathe the loop while safely seated and while NEVER using a gag strap, etc (in fact we do not let the student even place the mouth-bits of a mouthpiece inside the lips), and then to let them do word games and math questions until they first see symptoms of hypoxia. At that time they are recovered by dropping out the mouthpiece. This has been done 1000's of times and if monitored correctly is a safe and viable method of training.
Some links to other information:
This is the course that I ran for many years:
Altitude Chambers Don't Cut It For Pilot Training - Jetwhine - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion
This is a civil-access chamber course:
High-Altitude Chamber Course: Why it is a Must for Any Pilot | Coast Flight Training | iflycoast
More on the ROBS system:
Training to Survive Hypoxia Without Actually Getting It - Office of Naval Research
I'm interested to hear how many people have had this done in training, have tried it at home (DO NOT!, but please anonomously let us know via the poll), how many never thought about it, how many would like to take such a training event, and how many say "No Way Jose'" .
Discussion?
Dave
.
Last edited: