Improving the work of breathing of the JJ-CCR bailout valve - Page 3

ccrdave · September 10th, 2012, 03:00 PM

Quote: (Originally Posted by Mike Ferguson)

Just a wild guess but I would imagine that it's because it's doesn't meet the performance criteria of EN 250 due to excessive WOB in OC mode.

nope its not that

matt · September 10th, 2012, 03:27 PM

Quote: (Originally Posted by ccrdave)

nope its not that

Oooh, is this 20 questions?

Lack of cash?

Matt.

Tiptopperoo · September 10th, 2012, 03:30 PM

Quote: (Originally Posted by ccrdave)

nope its not that

Cmon Dave, spill the beans mate.

Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2

ccrdave · September 10th, 2012, 04:00 PM

Mike Ferguson · September 10th, 2012, 05:07 PM

begs the question, what did AP and VR do then? are their BOV's CE marked?

ccrdave · September 10th, 2012, 05:19 PM

Quote: (Originally Posted by Mike Ferguson)

begs the question, what did AP and VR do then? are their BOV's CE marked?

used a different notified body who apparently interpret the ce norm differently to the body used by JJ-CCR

September 10th, 2012, 03:00 PM	#21
ccrdave New Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: forest of Dean Posts: 206 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts	Quote: (Originally Posted by Mike Ferguson) Just a wild guess but I would imagine that it's because it's doesn't meet the performance criteria of EN 250 due to excessive WOB in OC mode. nope its not that
(Online)

September 10th, 2012, 03:27 PM	#22 (permalink)
matt New Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: London Posts: 1,541 Thanks: 168 Thanked 74 Times in 60 Posts	Quote: (Originally Posted by ccrdave) nope its not that Oooh, is this 20 questions? Lack of cash? Matt.
(Online)

September 10th, 2012, 03:30 PM	#23 (permalink)
Tiptopperoo CCRx Supporter Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Melbourne Posts: 98 Thanks: 21 Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts	Quote: (Originally Posted by ccrdave) nope its not that Cmon Dave, spill the beans mate. Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2
(Online)

September 10th, 2012, 04:00 PM	#24 (permalink)
ccrdave New Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: forest of Dean Posts: 206 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts	I did see the new thread I started http://www.ccrexplorers.com/showthread.php?t=14352
(Online)

September 10th, 2012, 05:07 PM	#25 (permalink)
Mike Ferguson WTF is that? Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Aberdeenshire Posts: 249 Thanks: 11 Thanked 114 Times in 43 Posts	begs the question, what did AP and VR do then? are their BOV's CE marked?
(Offline)

September 10th, 2012, 05:19 PM	#26 (permalink)
ccrdave New Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: forest of Dean Posts: 206 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts	Quote: (Originally Posted by Mike Ferguson) begs the question, what did AP and VR do then? are their BOV's CE marked? used a different notified body who apparently interpret the ce norm differently to the body used by JJ-CCR
(Online)