It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register for free click here
CCR Explorers
       

General diving Find a buddy, ask a question, have an observation...

Reply
 
Old July 13th, 2012, 05:29 PM   #1
Paul Haynes
CCRX Supporter
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 195
Thanks: 61
Thanked 143 Times in 27 Posts
Paul Haynes Paul Haynes
Send a message via Skype™ to Paul Haynes
Argon Hazard

Hi All,

reading the thread on calibration using less than 100% and seeing where it was heading, I thought I would start a new one on oxygen generation and argon. Having only dived where 100% oxygen was available, it is something I have no practical experience of and therefore unsure whether in practice excess argon has proven to have a detrimental impact to rebreather safety. However I have heard of it triggering a CCR fatality, although the source of this data is up for question and so do not intend to discuss the incident further.

Anyway as for the production of oxygen in remote locations and the potential hazard of argon, here goes:

Dry air contains 20.947% oxygen, 0.934% argon and the remainder nitrogen (ignore trace gases for this discussion). If you remove only the nitrogen by either molecular sieve, membrane separation or cryogenic distillation, the ratios of the oxygen and argon remains the same. So if you sieve air to produce 96% oxygen, you will end up with approximately 4% argon.

As ‘oxygen’ injected into the ‘loop’ is metabolised, the argon remains and gradually continues to build up as ‘oxygen’ is injected. In effect you’re breathing an oxygen, nitrogen, argon trimix if using an air diluent or a quad mix of oxygen, nitrogen, helium, argon if using a trimix diluent.

Whilst the actual percentage of argon within the loop may not be be that great depending upon the duration of the dive and the amount of 'oxygen' injected, argon I understand to be over twice as narcotic as nitrogen and the narcosis itself has a more psychotic effect. What then is the potential impact to decompression and / or narcosis levels? Is a periodic loop diluent flush good practice in such a scenario? Thoughts please guys and girls.
__________________
When you dive you enter an alien world, death is evolution's default state; at some point your life support will fail to function correctly, plan on it.
(Offline)  
Old July 13th, 2012, 06:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
nickb
The JJ Kid
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cardiff, UK
Posts: 513
Thanks: 75
Thanked 87 Times in 60 Posts
nickb nickb nickb nickb
Send a message via Skype™ to nickb
That's pretty much the discussion I had with a number of the other divers on the trip. I didn't do any flushing and, as far as I know, neither did anyone else.

I did feel slightly more narc'd than I would have expected at those depths with that mix and that's what prompted the discussion. I didn't notice this getting worse as the dives progressed and the longest I spent at 50m+ was just under 50 minutes. The longest run time was 140 minutes, but we were doing north of 4 hours every day.

I assumed the premixed dil was blended using the same generated O2, but never asked.

Empirical evidence, albeit based on a small population, would suggest that it's not much of a problem, if at all.

Interesting topic though.
(Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Old July 13th, 2012, 07:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
SimonK
New Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
SimonK
I did think the other thread was missing some dodgy maths so here goes.

If you assume:
4% Argon in your 'oxygen',
O2 injected at 1 litre/min,
18L loop volume (from DTs post)
Dive to 6 Bar for 50min

Then over the 50 min you will add 2l of Argon to the loop (50l/m x 0.04). The loop will contain 108L (18L x 6Bar) of gas, call it 100L to keep the sums simple. So you have added 2% argon. If we assume that Argon is twice as narcotic as Nitrogen then after 50min at 50m it would be equivalent to an 4% increase in the fraction of Nitrogen in the mix.

S
(Online)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Old July 13th, 2012, 08:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
nickb
The JJ Kid
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cardiff, UK
Posts: 513
Thanks: 75
Thanked 87 Times in 60 Posts
nickb nickb nickb nickb
Send a message via Skype™ to nickb
So, no biggy then? Which would seem to explain why it wasn't much of an issue for us.

Nice 'dodgy maths'
(Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Old July 13th, 2012, 09:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
matt
New Member
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,541
Thanks: 168
Thanked 72 Times in 59 Posts
matt matt matt matt
Here's a bit of info about Ar and rats:http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/...201/56_S39.pdf
(Online)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Old July 13th, 2012, 10:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Paul Haynes
CCRX Supporter
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 195
Thanks: 61
Thanked 143 Times in 27 Posts
Paul Haynes Paul Haynes
Send a message via Skype™ to Paul Haynes
Quote: (Originally Posted by matthewoutram)View Post
Here's a bit of info about Ar and rats:http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/...201/56_S39.pdf
Cheers, some bed time reading ;-)
__________________
When you dive you enter an alien world, death is evolution's default state; at some point your life support will fail to function correctly, plan on it.
(Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply

« | »



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 (Unregistered)
CCRExplorers.Com ©2012 - 2012
All rights reserved, no republishing of content without written permission.
By using this website you have agreed to our Terms & Conditions of Use
Array

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67